Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant persons.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines reduce the risk of contracting and developing complications from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Pregnant people are at increased risk of disease-related complications but have a higher prevalence of vaccine hesitancy (VH) than their nonpregnant counterparts. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe risk factors and COVID-19- and vaccine-related perspectives that lead to VH among pregnant people in Mexico to target strategies to increase vaccine acceptance in this population. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based study to evaluate risk factors and COVID-19- and vaccine-related perspectives associated with VH among pregnant people was conducted. Respondents were pregnant people of all ages attending a regular follow-up visit or admitted to labor and delivery in a third-level maternity hospital in Mexico. VH was defined as not having received a COVID-19 vaccine and either declining or being undecided to accept a vaccine during their pregnancy. We used bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate assess the relationship among demographic factors, COVID-19- and vaccine-related perspectives, and VH. RESULTS: A total of 1475 respondents completed the questionnaire; 216 (18%) were under the age of 18 years, and 860 (58%) had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. In this sample, 264 (18%) were classified as vaccine hesitant. Key factors associated with VH were adolescence, having family as a primary source of information, first pregnancy, and history of vaccines in previous pregnancies. COVID-19 perspectives were also strongly associated with VH. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant people in Mexico, VH is associated with demographic factors, vaccination history, sources of information, and perceived risks to the fetus. This information is relevant to policy makers and health care professionals to identify those more likely to be hesitant and to inform strategies to increase vaccine uptake among pregnant people.

Nasopharyngeal viral load at admission is not an independent predictor of thromboembolic complications in unvaccinated COVID-19 hospitalized patients.

COVID-19 patients may develop thrombotic complications, and data regarding an association between nasopharyngeal viral load and thrombosis is scarce. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal viral load upon admission is a useful prognostic marker for the development of thromboembolic events in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed a retrospective study of all hospitalized patients with a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV2 who had deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolization (PE), or arterial thrombosis diagnosed during their clinical course in a single academic center. The study population was divided according to the cycle threshold (Ct) value upon admission in patients with high viral load (Ct < 25), intermediate/medium viral load (Ct 25-30), and low viral load (Ct > 30). A regression model for propensity was performed matching in a 1:3 ratio those patients who had a thrombotic complication to those who did not. Among 2,000 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 41 (2.0%) developed thrombotic complications. Of these, 21 (51.2%) were diagnosed with PE, eight (19.5%) were diagnosed with DVT, and 12 (29.2%) were diagnosed with arterial thrombosis. Thrombotic complications occurred as frequently among the nasopharyngeal viral load or severity stratification groups with no statistically significant differences. Univariate logistic regression revealed increased odds for thrombosis only in mechanically ventilated patients OR 3.10 [1.37, 7.03] (p = 0.007). Admission SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal viral loads, as determined by Ct values, were not independently associated with thromboembolic complications among hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

High Altitude Carotid Body Tumors Growth During active Surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for patients with carotid body tumors (CBT) is surgical resection; nevertheless, some patients are unfit for surgery or, for other reasons, could not be operated on. Active surveillance has been known to be a reasonable strategy for these cases. This study aimed to evaluate tumor growth in unoperated patients with CBTs. METHODS: A retrospective review of all unoperated patients with CBT from a single academic hospital diagnosed between 2014 and 2021 was performed. Results of nonparametric testing were presented using the median and ranges for Mann-Whitney-U or Kruskal-Wallis. Significance was defined as a 2-tailed P < .05. RESULTS: The cohort included a total of 31 patients, with a median age of 60 years (range: 37-80 years), of which 27 (87.1%) were females. The patients live at a median altitude of 2800 meters (range: 2756-2980 meters) above sea level. Twenty (64.5%) patients had Shamblin I tumors, eight (25.8%) patients had Shamblin II tumors, and three (9.7%) patients had Shamblin III tumors. Median CBT volume at diagnosis was 14.1 cm3 (range: .9 - 213.3 cm3). Median volume at diagnosis of symptomatic tumors was substantially larger than asymptomatic tumors, 49.2 cm3 vs 7.9 cm3, respectively (P = .03). Median growth of the tumors during a median 15-month follow-up (range: 3-43 months) was 3.3 cm3 (range: 0-199.9 cm3). Overall, 77% (n = 24) of the CBTs grew at least 1 cm3. CONCLUSION: Most patients in the present study had tumor growth by at least 1 cm3, with a median tumor growth of 3.3 cm.3 In the present study tumor growth was shown to be greater than other low altitude CBT active surveillance studies; therefore, surgical resection should be recommended in patients with CBT living at high altitudes.

Salud mental de cuidadores de niños con trastornos del neurodesarrollo durante la pandemia

Resumen Los cuidadores son especialmente propensos a verse más afectados psicológicamente durante las restricciones sociales y del sistema sanitario generadas por la pandemia por COVID-19. Los cuidadores de niños con trastornos del neurodesarrollo (es decir, autismo, discapacidad intelectual, déficit de atención, hiperactividad, discapacidad motora) tienen un papel más importante que los que acompañan niños sanos. Se diseñó un estudio cuantitativo transversal, utilizando técnicas estadísticas descriptivas, comparativas y correlacionales, para analizar la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud, el malestar emocional y la sobrecarga en cuatro subgrupos de cuidadores, clasificados según el diagnóstico del niño. Se incluyeron 132 cuidadores (86,4% mujeres). En el grupo1 (discapacidad cognitiva) participaron 28 cuidadores;en el grupo2 (TDAH) se incluyeron 51;en el grupo3 (trastorno del espectro autista) participaron 33 cuidadores, y en el grupo4 (discapacidad motora) se incluyeron 20. Los principales hallazgos de este estudio fueron: 1)alteraciones en el rol físico, el dolor corporal, la salud general y la vitalidad;2)porcentajes muy bajos de sintomatología de depresión, ansiedad, estrés y sobrecarga;3)diferencias en el funcionamiento social entre los grupos de discapacidad motora y TDAH, y en el estrés y la sobrecarga entre los grupos de autismo y discapacidad motora, y 4)correlaciones moderadas entre las dimensiones de dolor corporal y rol emocional y la depresión, la ansiedad, el estrés y la sobrecarga. Se concluyó que hay más afectación en variables asociadas con la salud física que con las de la salud mental. Caregivers are especially likely to be more psychologically affected during the social and health care system constraints generated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Caregivers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (i.e., autism, intellectual disability, attention deficit, hyperactivity, motor disability) have a more essential role than caregivers of healthy children. A quantitative cross-sectional study was designed, using descriptive, comparative and correlational statistical techniques to analyze health-related quality of life, emotional distress and overload in four subgroups of caregivers, classified according to the child's diagnosis. A total of 132 caregivers (86.4% women) were included. In group1 (cognitive disability), 28 caregivers participated;in group2 (ADHD), 51 were included;in group3 (autism spectrum disorder), 33 caregivers participated, and in group4 (motor disability), 20 were included. The main findings of this study were: i)alterations in physical role, bodily pain, general health and vitality;ii)very low percentages of depression, anxiety, stress and overload symptomatology;iii)differences in social functioning between the motor disability and ADHD groups;and in stress and overload between the autism and motor disability groups;and iv)moderate correlations between the dimensions of bodily pain and emotional role and depression, anxiety, stress and overload. It was concluded that there is more impairment in variables associated with physical health than with mental health.

Factors associated with post-COVID-19 confinement vape use in young adults : Josue Eli Villegas Dominguez

Introduction The use of Vape has increased during the pandemic due to the changes generated by it. Currently we have finished the conditions of confinement, so it is important to identify Objective: To determine the factors associated with post-COVID-19 confinement vape consumption in young adults Methods A cross-sectional, prospective study was carried out between January and April 2022, including men and women residents of Veracruz aged between 18 and 35 years, excluding participants with addiction treatment or with a diagnosis of a lung disease. A survey was applied through Google Forms to identify the factors associated with Vape consumption after confinement by COVID-19, including depression, anxiety and stress evaluated with the DASS-21 instrument (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.79 and 0.87). For data analysis, SPSS v22 software was used, X2 test with Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI95%) and MannWhitney U test, assigning statistical significance with p < 0.05. Results 514 participants were included, with a prevalence of vape use of 28.5%. Physical activity, cigarette consumption by a family member, levels of anxiety, depression and stress showed a value of p > 0.05 for Vape consumption, while other factors (OR/95%CI) such as being female (0.6/0.4-0.9), identifying vape advertising on Facebook (0.35/0.19-0.65), having a family member who vapes (2.4/1.5-3.6), consuming cigarettes (4.2/2.7-6.4) and identifying vape advertising on Instagram (1.5/ 1.0-2.3) had values of p < 0.05 Conclusions Post-pandemic vape use is not affected by anxiety, stress or depression, identifying other factors that favor its use such as the environment in which it develops, such as being someone with a history of tobacco use, in addition to the family smoker and advertising on Instagram, which is a social network that often works as an aspirational image for users, a situation contrary to what is shown on Facebook. Key messages • Vape consumption continues to be a post-pandemic public health problem, so it is necessary to reinforce educational measures on the subject and the post-Covid complications of its use. • It is necessary to regulate vape advertising on social networks, as has been done with tobacco in different countries, since it can become a risk factor by showing aspirational images for users.

The plight of loneliness in Parkinson's disease: New opportunities.

The human phenomenon of loneliness has been increasing in prominence across societies, with precipitous increase since COVID-19, and individuals with Parkinson's disease are not unscathed. Loneliness is of clinical relevance as it is cross-sectionally related to, and longitudinally precedes, mortality and other health risks, including worse motor, cognitive, and behavioral-psychological functioning. Relatively few studies have evaluated loneliness, or associated social experiences, in the context of Parkinson's, but the existing data is provocative. The authors advocate for clinicians' awareness and researchers' investigational focus.

Medical decision support system using weakly-labeled lung CT scans

Purpose Determination and development of an effective set of models leveraging Artificial Intelligence techniques to generate a system able to support clinical practitioners working with COVID-19 patients. It involves a pipeline including classification, lung and lesion segmentation, as well as lesion quantification of axial lung CT studies. Approach A deep neural network architecture based on DenseNet is introduced for the classification of weakly-labeled, variable-sized (and possibly sparse) axial lung CT scans. The models are trained and tested on aggregated, publicly available data sets with over 10 categories. To further assess the models, a data set was collected from multiple medical institutions in Colombia, which includes healthy, COVID-19 and patients with other diseases. It is composed of 1,322 CT studies from a diverse set of CT machines and institutions that make over 550,000 slices. Each CT study was labeled based on a clinical test, and no per-slice annotation took place. This enabled a classification into Normal vs. Abnormal patients, and for those that were considered abnormal, an extra classification step into Abnormal (other diseases) vs. COVID-19. Additionally, the pipeline features a methodology to segment and quantify lesions of COVID-19 patients on the complete CT study, enabling easier localization and progress tracking. Moreover, multiple ablation studies were performed to appropriately assess the elements composing the classification pipeline. Results The best performing lung CT study classification models achieved 0.83 accuracy, 0.79 sensitivity, 0.87 specificity, 0.82 F1 score and 0.85 precision for the Normal vs. Abnormal task. For the Abnormal vs COVID-19 task, the model obtained 0.86 accuracy, 0.81 sensitivity, 0.91 specificity, 0.84 F1 score and 0.88 precision. The ablation studies showed that using the complete CT study in the pipeline resulted in greater classification performance, restating that relevant COVID-19 patterns cannot be ignored towards the top and bottom of the lung volume. Discussion The lung CT classification architecture introduced has shown that it can handle weakly-labeled, variable-sized and possibly sparse axial lung studies, reducing the need for expert annotations at a per-slice level. Conclusions This work presents a working methodology that can guide the development of decision support systems for clinical reasoning in future interventionist or prospective studies.

Professional Quality of Life of Healthcare Workers in Hospital Emergency Departments.

In previous publications, we have reported that professionals in emergency departments undergo high levels of stress according to the amounts of salivary biomarkers (α-amylase and cortisol). The stress seems to be counteracted by increased levels of dehydroepiandrosterone. This hypothesis is confirmed in the answers to different tests indicating no working stress, no anxiety, optimal self-efficacy, and good sleeping quality. Altogether, these previous results suggest an optimal adaptation of these workers to the demanding situations that occur in emergency departments. To complete this research, we decided to evaluate the quality of life of health professionals working in the emergency departments of two Spanish hospitals. A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out during the pre-pandemic months of July and August 2019. We determined the professional quality of life through the QPL-35 questionnaire in 97 participants, including nurses (n = 59) and medical doctors (n = 38). Answers to the test indicate that the studied participants working in emergency departments have a good perception of professional quality of life. This is reflected in the three dimensions of the questionnaire: managerial support, workloads, and intrinsic motivation. Based on the results of all answered tests, emergency healthcare staff seem to have adequate professional management, with levels of stress, sleep, and quality of life in line with a controlled lifestyle. Altogether, this would allow a correct adaptation to the demanding situations experienced in emergency departments. The relevance to clinical practice is that the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted this controlled professional management.

SARS-CoV-2 transmission from infected owner to household dogs and cats is associated with food sharing.

OBJECTIVES: Several cases of reverse transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from human to pets were reported during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the World Organization for Animal Health has recommended to improve SARS-CoV-2 surveillance on household animals to assess the risk of transmission between species. After such recommendation, we studied the potential SARS-CoV-2 infection in household dogs and cats in the city of Guayaquil, the most populated city in Ecuador. METHODS: Oral and nasal swab samples were collected from dogs and cats within 10 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result of their owners. Total ribonucleic acid was extracted and detection of viral gene targets N and ORF1ab was performed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: From the 50 cats and dogs tested, 12 were SARS-CoV-2 positive, giving a total positivity rate of 24%. A total of 1 of 8 cats tested positive, whereas 11 of 42 dogs were positive, yielding a positivity rate of 12.5% and 26.2%, respectively. SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed by whole genome sequencing. In addition, we also found a statistically significant association between SARS-CoV-2 pet positivity and food sharing with infected owners. CONCLUSION: This study is the second active surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in household dogs and cats in Latin America. Moreover, it is the first study to address the risk factors associated with potential anthropogenic SARS-CoV-2 transmission to domestic cats and dogs. Given the high presence of free-roaming dogs and cats in rural and urban areas in Latin American countries and the high capacity shown by coronaviruses for interspecies transmission, our findings support the view that SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in pets is necessary to better understand the role that pet-human interaction plays in the COVID-19 spread.

Case Series of Successful Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Treatment in 4 Pregnant Patients with Severe COVID-19-Induced Hypoxia.

BACKGROUND Despite unprecedented speed in the execution of the COVID-19 vaccine and therapeutic clinical trials, pregnant patients have been largely excluded from initial studies. In addition, pregnant patients who are unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 have greater morbidity risk with severe COVID-19 disease as compared to patients of similar age and comorbidity status. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been deemed safe in pregnancy in other diseases. Prior data demonstrate the possible benefit of utilizing IVIG for the treatment in hospitalized patients with severe respiratory symptoms associated with COVID-19 active infections when administered within 14 days of COVID symptom onset. CASE REPORT We administered IVIG (Privigen®, CSL Behring) 0.5 g/kg daily for 3 consecutive days to 4 pregnant patients (ages 24-34 years of age) who were hospitalized with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 and not vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. All patients received concomitant glucocorticoid therapy. Gestational ages were 26, 17, 35, and 35 weeks. All patients were discharged home breathing room air after a mean hospital stay of 15 days. Two patients had uncomplicated cesarean section at 35 weeks during the hospitalization. The pre-term pregnancies at 17 and 26 weeks were intact at hospital discharge and resulted in normal vaginal deliveries at term. All 4 patients consented to participate in this case series report. CONCLUSIONS IVIG may be a safe treatment consideration in pregnant women with severe COVID-19 to avoid pregnancy complications. Its use warrants further study in pregnancy acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and other respiratory viruses to which pregnant patients are vulnerable.

Peripheral Neuropathies Derived from COVID-19: New Perspectives for Treatment.

Peripheral neuropathies constitute a group of disorders affecting the peripheral nervous system. Neuropathies have multiple causes such as infections (i.e., COVID-19), diabetes, and nutritional (low vitamin levels), among others. Many micronutrients, such as vitamins (A, C, D, E, B6, B12, and folate), certain minerals (Fe, Mg, Zn, Se, and Cu), and ω-3 fatty acids have immunomodulatory effects. Therefore, they may play an instrumental role in the treatment of COVID-19 infection. However, many COVID-19 patients can undergo neuropathy. In this context, there is a wealth of information on a variety of first-, second-, and third-line treatment options. This review focuses on the application of nutraceutical strategies in order to improve the symptomatology of neuropathy and neuropathic pain in patients that suffered from COVID-19. Our aim is to provide an alternative vision to traditional medical-pharmacological treatment through nutraceuticals.

Unexpected arterial thrombosis and acute limb ischemia in COVID-19 patients. Results from the Ibero-Latin American acute arterial thrombosis registry in COVID-19: (ARTICO-19).

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have focused on arterial thrombosis and acute limb ischemia in COVID-19. This international registry intended to study the spectrum of clinical characteristics, therapeutic trends, and outcomes in a cohort of Ibero-Latin American patients with arterial thrombosis or acute limb ischemia and COVID-19. METHODS: Data were retrospectively obtained from 21 centers in 9 countries. Patients with proven COVID-19 and asymptomatic or symptomatic arterial thrombosis were included. COVID-19 diagnosis was established by RT-PCR assay or IgM serology plus suggestive clinical/radiographical findings. We recorded and analyzed variables related to demography, clinical presentation, therapeutic trends, and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty one patients were included in the registry. In 38.3%, acute limb ischemia symptoms were the first manifestation of COVID-19. Non-surgical management was more frequent in severe cases than surgical interventions, 11.1% vs. 88.9%, respectively (p = 0.004). Amputation rates were similar between all COVID severity groups (p = 0.807). Treatment was classified as non-surgical, open surgical, and endovascular treatment. Further analysis revealed an equal frequency of major leg amputation between treatment groups and increased mortality in patients with non-surgical management. However, multivariate regression analysis showed that treatment choices are associated with disease severity, with significant non-surgical treatment in critical patients; thus, mortality is related to the severity and confounds treatment analysis. CONCLUSION: Arterial thrombosis can be the initial symptom of a patient presenting with COVID-19. Physicians and health workers should potentially suspect COVID-19 in acute ischemia cases without a known risk factor or embolic cause. More experimental and clinical research is required to understand the complex phenomenon of arterial COVID-19 induced coagulopathy fully.

COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance in Mexico: a web-based nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance among the Mexican population. METHODS: In a web-based nationwide survey in early December 2020, respondents were inquired about their sociodemographic characteristics and their willingness to accept a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine given a 50% or 90% effectiveness. A logistic regression model was used to identify the factors associated with hesitancy and acceptance. RESULTS: A total 3 768 responses were analyzed. A 90% effective vaccine was accepted by 85% of respondents, while only 46% would accept being vaccinated with a 50% effective vaccine. In univariate analysis, each age group (40-49, 50-59, and ≥60) was strongly associated with vaccine hesitancy for a 90% effective vaccine (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38, 0.63; OR 0.33, 95 CI 0.26, 0.41; and OR 0.28, 95 CI 0.21, 0.38, respectively) compared to the 18-39 age group. After multivariable adjustment, similar magnitudes of association were observed. Being female and higher socioeconomic status were also associated with higher vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine hesitancy represents a major public health problem in Mexico and is driven by multiple factors. Our study provides relevant insights for the development of effective policies and strategies to ensure widespread vaccination in Mexico.

Thirty-three vascular residency programs among 13 countries joining forces to improve surgical education in times of COVID-19: A survey-based assessment.

BACKGROUND: Academic interaction with mentors has almost become minimal due to the current pandemic of COVID-19. The objective of this study is to introduce how a group of vascular surgery residencies joined forces to improve surgical education in times of COVID-19. METHODS: On May 2020, a group of Hispanic American vascular residency programs created webinar sessions of arterial and venous clinical cases among vascular residents across Latin America and Europe. Participants were surveyed via email. Questions were about the perceived quality and utility of the webinars; answers were stratified into negative (disagree), neutral, and positive (agree). RESULTS: There have been 60 sessions and 118 clinical cases presented. The survey was answered by 106 participants, 82 males (78.8%) and 24 women (23.0%). Fifty-four (51.9%) were board-certified vascular surgeons, 49 (47.1%) vascular surgery residents, and 2 (1.9%) general surgery residents. Mean age of the participants was 41.5 years (range: 25-74 years). Mean years of vascular surgery practice or experience were 11.2 years (range: 0-45 years). The residency programs involved in this project were from 13 different countries. Most answers received were positive for both perceived quality and utility of the webinars. CONCLUSION: Globalization and technology provide an opportunity for international education, with the goal of building well-rounded and academic vascular surgeons. This group is just the beginning of a large collaborative group among Hispanic American countries, hoping that more residency programs will join, with the aim of breaking borders in the education of vascular surgery.

Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with allergic diseases.

BACKGROUND: On March 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 to be a pandemic disease. Interactions between allergy-related inflammatory and psychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been documented. Therefore, those who have pre-existing allergic conditions may have an increased psychiatric reaction to the stresses of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: Identify the psychological impact of COVID-19 in patients with allergic diseases and determine if these individuals have a greater risk of presenting with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). METHODS: It is a cross-sectional, survey-based study designed to assess the degree of symptoms of depression and the risk of PTSD using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), respectively, in allergic patients. RESULTS: A total of 4106 surveys were evaluated; 1656 (40.3%) were patients with allergic disease, and 2450 (59.7%) were non-allergic (control) individuals. Of those with allergies, 76.6% had respiratory allergic disease including asthma and allergic rhinitis. Individuals with allergic disease reported higher scores regarding symptoms of PTSD on the IES-R scale (p = 0.052, OR 1.24 CI 0.99-1.55) as well as a higher depression risk score in the PHQ-9 questionnaire (mean 6.82 vs. 5.28) p = 0.000 z = -8.76.The allergy group presented a higher score in the IES-R questionnaire (mean 25.42 vs. 20.59), being more susceptible to presenting PTSD (p = 0.000, z = -7.774).The individuals with allergic conditions were further divided into subgroups of those with respiratory allergies such as allergic rhinitis and asthma vs those with non-respiratory allergies such as drug and food allergy, urticaria and atopic dermatitis. This subgroup analysis compares respiratory versus non-respiratory allergic patients, with similar results on the IES-R (mean 25.87 vs 23.9) p = 0.0124, z = -1.539. There was no significant difference on intrusion (p = 0.061, z = -1.873) and avoidance (p = 0.767, z = -0.297), but in the hyperarousal subscale, patients with respiratory allergy had higher scores (mean 1.15 vs. 0.99) p = 0.013 z = -2.486. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological consequences such as depression and reported PTSD are present during the COVID-19 pandemic causing an impact particularly in individuals with allergic diseases. If we acknowledge the impact and how it is affecting our patients, we are able to implement interventions, follow up, and contribute to their overall well-being.